Talk:Codex-10Bp1
From LostRing
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 14:42, 24 April 2008 (edit) Canzonett (Talk | contribs) (New page: What confuses me here is that the codex mentions one stone per temple, but then describes this one stone with a plural - omphaloi instead of omphalos. Any ideas?) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (14:42, 24 April 2008) (edit) (undo) Canzonett (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| What confuses me here is that the codex mentions one stone per temple, but then describes this one stone with a plural - omphaloi instead of omphalos. Any ideas? | What confuses me here is that the codex mentions one stone per temple, but then describes this one stone with a plural - omphaloi instead of omphalos. Any ideas? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Canzonett | ||
Current revision
What confuses me here is that the codex mentions one stone per temple, but then describes this one stone with a plural - omphaloi instead of omphalos. Any ideas?
Canzonett
