Codex-7Bp1-English

From LostRing

Revision as of 14:56, 4 April 2008 (edit) Limako (Talk | contribs) (→English) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 15:36, 4 April 2008 (edit) (undo) Brodie (Talk | contribs) (→English) Next diff →
Line 5:		Line 5:
	|language=English		|language=English
	|need=translation		|need=translation
-	|translationby=[[User:Nicolas|Nicolas]] & MauroKing	+	|translationby=chid12 and Brodie
	|translation=		|translation=
-	::'''The limits of many worlds'''	+
-	:<br>	+	Chapter 14
-	:No matter how incalculably big the multiverse, it does indeed have inherent limits. It cannot grow endlessly large.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	The limits of the Many Worlds
-	:The number of many worlds can increase until bigger than any imaginable number. But scientists believe that is a limit to how many worlds reality can simultaneously support. This is the “upper limit" of reality and nobody knows precisely what would happen, if that upper limit is surpassed.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	However incalculably large the multiverse is in size, it has limits. It cannot grow infinitely large.
-	:The most often being accepted a theory is at crossing the superior limit of realness would bring about type of an elastic react in the unnal direction, maybe while disdropping everybody of the billions of worlds into a single world, of where realness would rebegin from the beginning. A new be born of the multiverse.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	The number of the many worlds can grow higher than any imaginable number. But scientists believe that there is a limit as to how many worlds reality can support simultaneously. This is the “upper limit” of reality and nobody knows precisely what would occur if that upper limit is passed.
-	:To 99.9 x 10^8 percent of the mankind across the many worlds, this would is somewhat tragic event. Thankfully, the reality has a natural mechanism to diminish the number of simultaneous worlds.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	The most often accepted theory is that passing the maximum limit of reality would bring about a type of elastic reaction in the wrong direction, maybe perhaps thus dropping everybody from the billions of worlds into a single world, where reality would start again from the beginning. A new multiverse would be born.
-	:The majority of the insignificant decisions lead to the same result. If a leaf falls down in the land or not, or if a fish not upstream or downstream at all, or if a proton turns to the left or the right, all these insignificant differences are precisely the same result across the time. As result, it is not necessary that multiple worlds represent both possible results. The reality can bring together the multiple branches that it created to join multiple results in an alone branch.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	For 99.9 x 10^8 percent of the beings across the many worlds, this would be a somewhat tragic event. Luckily, reality has a natural mechanism for decreasing the number of simultaneous worlds.
-	:The reality at the time diminishes constant the number of simultaneous worlds as it creates new.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	The majority of trifling decisions eventually lead to the same result. Whether a leaf falls to the earth or not, or a fish swims up or down, or a proton rotates to the left or to the right - these trifling differences have precisely the same result. As a result, there is no need that the multiverse should have to represent both possible results. Reality can reunite the multiple branches which it created in order to show multiple results in a single branch.
-	:This is, nevertheless, a carefully balanced act, nevertheless, and not always it seemed to be had successful. In fact, human beings civilized across the multiverse seemingly risked the multiverse to come to the top limit.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	Reality therefore constantly decreases the number of simultaneous worlds, even though at the same time it constantly creates new ones.
-	:The history humanizes, in agreement with the scientists, it brought an extremely rapid increase of the number of worlds. Our constant exercise of the free will will create a great number of not ordinary worlds which ends never return to the unique track.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	This is a carefully balanced act, and it does not always seem to succeed. In fact, civilised human beings across the multiverse apparently put the multiverse at risk on account of trying to reach the upper limit.
-	:When the results fail in be solving alone, an alternative - and from the point of view of a human, less desirable being - natural synchronization might happen, the Rapid Continental Changes. This one seems to be the method to avoid the frequent elastic reaction. Seemingly, to the mother nature does not like to restart necessarily the matter. It is of some form an advantage for us.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	Human history, according to scientists, brought about an extremely quick increase in the number of worlds. Our constant exercising of free will creates an unordinarily large number of worlds whose decisions never return to a single track.
-	:The Rapid Continental Changes are preferable before that the destruction of the entire multiverse, but changes cataclysmic spontaneous to the continental structure of the Earth are still events little wished by the human beings.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	When results are not successful in synchronising, an alternative – and from a human perspective, less desirable – natural synchronising method could occur, the Quick Continental Change. This seems to be a method which is unable to have frequent elastic reactions. Apparently Mother Nature does not like to re-start matters. That gives us a small advantage. Quick Continental Changes are preferable to the destruction of the entire multiverse, but cataclysmic spontaneous changes to the continental structure of the Earth are still very undesirable events for human beings.
-	:Since it is observed by the pan-cosmologists, they are a consequence of the incalculable number of decisions done across every world in every moment. The differences that we believe in our lives it moves to the rest of the worlds more near the dangerous top limit.	+	<br><br>
-	:<br>	+	What pan-cosmologists observe are consistencies to the incalculable number of decisions made across each world in each moment. Each difference which we create in our lives moves the remainder of the worlds closer to that dangerous upper limit.
-	:This is, understandably, why so many worlds form a part in rites of coordination and synchronization, as the labyrinth and the Olympiads Multiversal.	+	<br><br>
		+	This, understandably, is why so many worlds take part in co-ordinating and synchronising rites – such as the labyrinth and the Multiverse Olympiad.
	}}<br clear="all">		}}<br clear="all">

---

Revision as of 15:36, 4 April 2008

English

Chapter 14: The limits of many worlds

(translation by chid12 and Brodie)
Chapter 14

The limits of the Many Worlds

However incalculably large the multiverse is in size, it has limits. It cannot grow infinitely large.

The number of the many worlds can grow higher than any imaginable number. But scientists believe that there is a limit as to how many worlds reality can support simultaneously. This is the “upper limit” of reality and nobody knows precisely what would occur if that upper limit is passed.

The most often accepted theory is that passing the maximum limit of reality would bring about a type of elastic reaction in the wrong direction, maybe perhaps thus dropping everybody from the billions of worlds into a single world, where reality would start again from the beginning. A new multiverse would be born.

For 99.9 x 10^8 percent of the beings across the many worlds, this would be a somewhat tragic event. Luckily, reality has a natural mechanism for decreasing the number of simultaneous worlds.

The majority of trifling decisions eventually lead to the same result. Whether a leaf falls to the earth or not, or a fish swims up or down, or a proton rotates to the left or to the right - these trifling differences have precisely the same result. As a result, there is no need that the multiverse should have to represent both possible results. Reality can reunite the multiple branches which it created in order to show multiple results in a single branch.

Reality therefore constantly decreases the number of simultaneous worlds, even though at the same time it constantly creates new ones.

This is a carefully balanced act, and it does not always seem to succeed. In fact, civilised human beings across the multiverse apparently put the multiverse at risk on account of trying to reach the upper limit.

Human history, according to scientists, brought about an extremely quick increase in the number of worlds. Our constant exercising of free will creates an unordinarily large number of worlds whose decisions never return to a single track.

When results are not successful in synchronising, an alternative – and from a human perspective, less desirable – natural synchronising method could occur, the Quick Continental Change. This seems to be a method which is unable to have frequent elastic reactions. Apparently Mother Nature does not like to re-start matters. That gives us a small advantage. Quick Continental Changes are preferable to the destruction of the entire multiverse, but cataclysmic spontaneous changes to the continental structure of the Earth are still very undesirable events for human beings.

What pan-cosmologists observe are consistencies to the incalculable number of decisions made across each world in each moment. Each difference which we create in our lives moves the remainder of the worlds closer to that dangerous upper limit.

This, understandably, is why so many worlds take part in co-ordinating and synchronising rites – such as the labyrinth and the Multiverse Olympiad.